|

In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) set new National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for a
form of air pollution known as “fine particles,” or PM2.5
– particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter.i Fine particles can
cause serious health effects at relatively low concentrations. Tens of thousands of
premature deaths each year are attributed to fine particle air
pollution. ii
The Clean Air Act requires EPA to review and update
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards every five years in light
of new scientific and medical studies.iii In May 2003, the U.S.
District Court settlement between the American Lung Association and
nine environmental groups and the EPA puts EPA on an enforceable
schedule to complete the review of the fine particle standard by
December 2005.
- Fine particles in the air are made up of a variety
of microscopic substances: acid aerosols such as
sulfates and nitrates, organic chemicals, metals, and carbon
soot.iv
- Combustion of fossil
fuels is the major source of fine particle emissions into the
atmosphere.
Fine particles can be emitted directly into the air as smoke
from wood stoves or agricultural burning or as soot from the
exhaust of diesel trucks, buses and heavy equipment. Fine particles can also be
formed from gaseous emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxides and
organic compounds that are transformed in the atmosphere into
sulfate, nitrate, and carbonaceous aerosols. The major sources of these
emissions are coal-fired power plants, factories, and
cars.v
Prevailing winds can transport fine particles hundreds of miles in
the atmosphere.
- Fine particles are
easily inhaled deep into the lungs where they can remain embedded
for long periods of time.vi
- Click here to
view a Quicktime animation on how
particle pollution affects the lungs. You
must have Quicktime installed on your computer to play our movie.
Quicktime installation is easy! Just visit their
website: http://www.quicktime.com and
download.
- Hundreds of community
health studies have linked daily increases in fine particle
pollution to reduced lung function, greater use of asthma
medications, and increased rates of school absenteeism, emergency
room visits, hospital admissions, and premature death.vii
- In people with heart
disease, very short-term exposures of one hour to elevated fine
particle concentrations have been linked to irregular heart beats
and heart attacks.viii
- Long-term
epidemiological studies have repeatedly demonstrated that people
living in areas with high fine particle concentrations have an
increased risk of premature death compared to those in cleaner
cities.ix
The risk of dying early from cardio-respiratory diseases and
lung cancer is higher in more polluted areas.x Lives
might be shortened by one to two years on average.xi
- Fine particle
pollution is especially harmful to people with lung diseases such
as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which
includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema, because particles can
aggravate these diseases.xii
Exposure to fine particle air pollution can trigger asthma
flare-ups and cause wheezing, coughing, and respiratory irritation
in individuals with sensitive airways.xiii People
with heart disease such as coronary artery disease and congestive
heart failure and people with diabetes are at risk of serious
cardiac effects.xiv
- The elderly are at
increased risk from fine particle air pollution. Numerous community
health studies have shown that when particle levels are high,
senior citizens are more likely to be hospitalized for heart and
lung problems, and some may die prematurely.xv
- Infants and children
may be especially susceptible to the health effects of fine
particle pollution, because their lungs are still developing. Children have
greater exposure to air pollution because of their faster
breathing rates and the increased amount of time spent playing
outdoors.xvi In
addition to aggravated wheezing and coughing and reduction in lung
function, over the long term, particle air pollution could stunt
lung function growth in children.xvii
- Some studies suggest
that pregnant women may be another sensitive group. A limited number of
studies report that high particle concentrations are associated
with low birth weight in infants, pre-term delivery, and increased
risk of infant mortality.xviii
· The current federal standard
for PM2.5 is 65 µg/m 3 measured over a 24-hour
period, and 15 µg/m 3 on an annual average basis. California has established a
more stringent annual average standard of 12 µg/m 3. Many areas of the United
States have unhealthy concentrations of fine particle
pollution.
· Areas where fine particle
concentrations exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
must be designated as “nonattainment areas” under the Clean Air
Act. States must
develop “State Implementation Plans” with enforceable strategies to
reduce air pollution in order to attain the health standards.
· To limit exposure to fine
particle air pollution, the American Lung Association offers the
following tips:
o
Avoid exercising
near high-traffic areas
o
Do not exercise
outdoors when particle levels are high, or substitute an activity
that requires less exertion
o
Eliminate indoor
smoking
o
Reduce use of
fireplaces and wood-burning stoves
###
For 100 years, the
American Lung Association has been the lead organization working to
prevent lung disease and promote lung health. Lung disease death
rates continue to increase while other leading causes of death have
declined. The American Lung Association funds vital research on the
causes of and treatments for lung disease. With the generous support
of the public, the American Lung Association is “Improving life, one
breath at a time.” For more information about the American Lung
Association or to support the work it does, call 1-800-LUNG-USA
(1-800-586-4872) or log on to www.lungusa.org.
[i] U.S. EPA. 40 CFR Part 50 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final Rule; Federal
Register Vol. 62, No. 138, pp. 38651-38701, July 18,
1997.
[ii] Abt Associates. Death, Disease and Dirty Power:
Mortality and Health Damage Due to Air Pollution from Power Plants.
Report prepared for the Clean Air Task Force, October 2000; and Shprentz, DS,
Bryner, GC, and Shprentz JS. Breath-Taking: Premature Mortality Due
to Particulate Air Pollution in 239 American Cities. Natural
Resources Defense Council Report, May 1996.
[iii] Section 109(d)(1) of
the Clean Air Act.
[iv] U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Particulate Matter: Policy Assessment of Scientific and Technical
Information; OAQPS Staff Paper, EPA-452\R-96-013, July 1996.
[v] U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. Latest Findings on National Air Quality: 2001 Status and
Trends. EPA 454/K-02-001, September 2002.
[vi] U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development.
Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter. Chapter 10: Dosimetry
of Inhaled Particles in the Respiratory Tract. EPA/600/P-95/001bF,
April 1996.
[vii] California Air
Resources Board and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment.
Staff Report: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to
the Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter and
Sulfates. May 3, 2002.
[viii]Peters A, Liu E, Verrier RL,
Schwartz J, Gold DR, Mittleman M, Baliff J, Oh JA, Allen G, Monahan
K, and Dockery DW. Air pollution and incidence of
cardiac arrhythmia. Epidemiology 2000 Jan; 11(1):11-7; and Peters A, Dockery DW,
Muller JE, and Mittleman MA. Increased particulate air pollution and the
triggering of myocardial infarction.Circulation 2001
Jun 12; 103(23):2810-5.
[ix] Krewski,
D. et al. Reanalysis of the Harvard six cities study and the
American Cancer Society study of particulate air pollution and
mortality. Health Effects Institute, July
2000.
[x] Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE,
Krewski D, Ito K, and Thurston GD. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary
mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air
pollution. JAMA
2002 Mar 6; 287(9):1132-41.
[xi] Brunekreef B. Air pollution and life
expectancy: is there a relation? Occup Environ Med 1997; 54:
781-84.
[xii] Zanobetti A, Schwartz
J, Gold D.
Are there
sensitive subgroups for the effects of airborne particles? Environ Health
Perspect 2000 Sep; 108(9):841-5; and Sunyer J, and Basagana X. Particles, and not gases, are
associated with the risk of death in patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Epidemiol 2001 Oct;
30(5):1138-40.
[xiii] Ostro B, Lipsett M,
Mann J, Braxton-Owens H, White M. Air pollution and exacerbation of
asthma in African-American children in Los Angeles. Epidemiology 2001
Mar; 12(2):200-8; and Norris G, YoungPong SN, Koenig JQ, Larson TV,
Sheppard L, and Stout JW. An association between fine
particles and asthma emergency department visits for children in
Seattle. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107:489-493.
[xiv] Goldberg MS, Bailar
JC 3rd, Burnett RT, Brook JR, Tamblyn R, Bonvalot Y, Ernst P, Flegel
KM, Singh RK, Valois MF. Identifying subgroups of the
general population that may be susceptible to short-term increases
in particulate air pollution: a time-series study in Montreal,
Quebec. Res Rep
Health Eff Inst 2000 Oct;(97): 7-113; discussion 115-20; and
Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Cardiovascular damage by airborne
particles: are diabetics more susceptible? Epidemiology 2002
Sep; 13(5):588-92.
[xv] Pope CA 3rd. Epidemiology of fine
particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms and
who's at risk? Environ Health
Perspect 2000 Aug; 108 Suppl 4:713-23; and Samet JM, Zeger SL,
Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Dockery DW, Schwartz J, and
Zanobetti A. The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution
Study. Part II: Morbidity, Mortality and Air Pollution in the United
States. Health Effects Institute Research Report 94, Part II, June
2000.
[xvi] Bates DV. The effects of air pollution on
children.
Environ Health Perspect 1995 Sep; 103 Suppl 6:49-53.
[xvii]Gauderman WJ,
Gilliland GF, Vora H, Avol E, Stram D, McConnell R, Thomas D,
Lurmann F, Margolis HG, Rappaport EB, Berhane K, and Peters JM.
Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
Southern California children: Results from a second cohort. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med 2002 Jul 1; 166(1):76-84; and Horak F Jr,
Studnicka M, Gartner C, Spengler JD, Tauber E, Urbanek R, Veiter A,
and Frischer T.. Particulate matter and lung function growth in
children: A 3-yr Follow-up Study in Austrian Schoolchildren. Eur
Respir J 2002 May; 19(5):838-45.
[xviii] Ritz B, Yu F,
Chapa G, and Fruin, S.
Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born
in Southern California between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology
2000 Sep; 11(5):502-11; and Woodruff TJ, Grillo J,
Schoendorf KC. The relationship
between selected causes of postneonatal infant mortality and
particulate air pollution in the United States. Environ Health
Perspect 1997 Jun; 105(6):608-12.
|